Amazon — Sometimes the Worst Looking Stocks Have the Best Potential
- Posted by jstephencastellano
- on April 26th, 2011
Believe it or not, Amazon.com Inc. ($AMZN) is one of the worst ranked stocks in our universe. Check out our rankings below.
Rules systematically applied across 3000+ stocks has helped us create a number of successful growth-at-a-reasonable-price strategies, but with any rules-based environment there occasionally exceptions. And it appears that AMZN may represent the perfect exception.
AMZN ranks poorly because relative value is poor (its PEG ratio at 1.6 is even higher than Netflix, Inc.’s ($NFLX)), ROIC and other key metrics have been declining or stagnating over recent quarters, and analysts have been taking estimates down. This stock is not going to appear on any fundamental momentum screen — except as a misplaced short idea. We think a number of investors may be feeling the same way about AMZN, hence potentially setting up the stock for explosive price appreciation even from the current level.
Taking a look at the model below, which is in part driven by consensus average estimates, it appears capital spending may have peaked for the company while EBIT, NOPLAT and free cash flow may soon surge — all while R&D expenses surge as well. This seems too good to be true, yet a closer look at our model updated for today’s quarter report reveals no obvious flaws (a more detailed version is available on request).
Even extrapolating from consensus low estimates over the next five quarters, AMZN’s prospects still looks positive.
What to do with this information? It is tough to make an off-the-cuff call on such a high multiple company but the numbers look promising. Any company that can double R&D spending and still grow reported margins deserves to be studied closely regardless of valuation. The incremental spend on R&D should be viewed as an investment in future cash flows as opposed to an expense. The far-out EBIT and capital spending estimates need to be confirmed and the story behind them need to be fully understood. If indeed consensus low estimates correctly augur a positive trend in ROIC expansion, a weighted DCF scenario analysis should be conducted. My guess is such a DCF analysis would point to a more ‘normal’ looking PE ratio on earnings 3-4 years out. (For an example of the type of DCF scenario analysis one might conduct, take a look at our report on Starbucks Corp. ($SBUX) from last year.)
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
blog comments powered by Disqus-
J. Stephen Castellano founded Ascendere Associates LLC to provide innovative equity research and investment advisory services that blends fundamental and quantitative approaches... More » -
Archives
-


